Bureaucrats, Interface administrators, Administrators (Semantic MediaWiki), Curators (Semantic MediaWiki), Editors (Semantic MediaWiki), Suppressors, Administrators
19,911
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 1:
Line 1: − <div class='titlespan'+ − style='display:inline-block;font-size:20pt;font-weight:bold;margin-top:0pt;margin-bottom:5pt;'>Genealogical+ − − <div class='subtitlespan' − style='display:inline-block;font-size:16pt;margin-top:0pt;margin-bottom:5pt;'>for − − − </div> − <div id='page-content' − style="display: block;margin: 0.25in;margin-top: 2em;font-family:'Times New Roman',times;"> − <h2>Summary of Findings</h2> − <h2>Itemized Research Findings</h2>+ Line 50:
Line 41: − ((https://familysearch.org/learn/wiki/en/Social_Security_Death_Index_(SSDI)))</p>+ Line 82:
Line 73: − ((https://familysearch.org/learn/wiki/en/Social_Security_Death_Index_(SSDI)))</p>+ Line 126:
Line 117: − ((https://familysearch.org/learn/wiki/en/New_York_State_Census,_1915_(FamilySearch_Historical_Records)))</p>+ Line 179:
Line 170: − ((Middlesex County, Massachusetts, Probate Court, Deposition of+ − + − + − + − + − + Line 335:
Line 326: + +
Oliver Haswell James/Genealogical Proof Report (view source)
Revision as of 06:56, 16 July 2013
, 06:56, 16 July 2013no edit summary
=Genealogical Proof Report for the Birth of Oliver H. James (<tng i="10704">I10704</tng>)=
==Summary of Findings==
Proof Report</div>
the Birth of Oliver H. James (I10704)</div>
</div>
<p>I have only located one document containing Oliver’s full
<p>I have only located one document containing Oliver’s full
date of birth, 14 Nov 1904, his SS-5. After evaluating this date
date of birth, 14 Nov 1904, his SS-5. After evaluating this date
versus all other known sources it seems to fit.</p>
versus all other known sources it seems to fit.</p>
==Itemized Research Findings==
<p>12 assertions from 12 sources were considered in evaluating this
<p>12 assertions from 12 sources were considered in evaluating this
claim.</p>
claim.</p>
<p>Until 1972, applicants weren’t required to prove proof of
<p>Until 1972, applicants weren’t required to prove proof of
identity.
identity.
<ref>https://familysearch.org/learn/wiki/en/Social_Security_Death_Index_(SSDI)</re></p>
<p>This is the only document I have been able to locate which lists
<p>This is the only document I have been able to locate which lists
Oliver's complete date of birth.</p>
Oliver's complete date of birth.</p>
<p>Until 1972, applicants weren’t required to prove proof of
<p>Until 1972, applicants weren’t required to prove proof of
identity.
identity.
<ref>https://familysearch.org/learn/wiki/en/Social_Security_Death_Index_(SSDI)</ref></p>
<p>This is the only document I have been able to locate which lists
<p>This is the only document I have been able to locate which lists
Oliver's complete date of birth.</p>
Oliver's complete date of birth.</p>
<p>This census recorded the name of each person living in home on 1
<p>This census recorded the name of each person living in home on 1
June 1915.
June 1915.
<ref>https://familysearch.org/learn/wiki/en/New_York_State_Census,_1915_(FamilySearch_Historical_Records)</ref></p>
<p>This range fits within the general time frame of other known
<p>This range fits within the general time frame of other known
sources.</p>
sources.</p>
been 21 at the time of the marriage. At the time, Connecticut state
been 21 at the time of the marriage. At the time, Connecticut state
law required a parent to be present if an individual was under 21
law required a parent to be present if an individual was under 21
<ref>Middlesex County, Massachusetts, Probate Court, Deposition of
Hezekiah R. Elwood, Page 4, 29 May 1929, case 5702, Oliver H. James
Hezekiah R. Elwood, Page 4, 29 May 1929, case 5702, Oliver H. James
vs Rachael James; Massachusetts State Archive, Boston.)), thus
vs Rachael James; Massachusetts State Archive, Boston.</ref>, thus
hopefully invalidating the marriage. There are no comments
hopefully invalidating the marriage. There are no comments
specifically on this assertion, but a divorce was granted rather
specifically on this assertion, but a divorce was granted rather
than an annulment.</p>
than an annulment.</p>
<p>Given a birth date of 14 Nov 1904 and their marriage date of 23
<p>Given a birth date of 14 Nov 1904 and their marriage date of 23
Dec 1923, (( State of Connecticut Bureau of Vital Statistics,
Dec 1923, <ref>State of Connecticut Bureau of Vital Statistics,
Marriage Certificate (23 Dec 1923), Oliver James and Rachel Winch
Marriage Certificate (23 Dec 1923), Oliver James and Rachel Winch
Edwards; Town Of Fairfield.)) Oliver would have been 19 years 1
Edwards; Town Of Fairfield.</ref> Oliver would have been 19 years 1
month 1 week 2 days when he was married. This supports both
month 1 week 2 days when he was married. This supports both
Oliver’s claims in is patition for annulment (( Middlesex
Oliver’s claims in is patition for annulment <ref>Middlesex
County, Massachusetts, Probate Court, Petition for Annulment, Page
County, Massachusetts, Probate Court, Petition for Annulment, Page
1, 8 Mar 1929, case 5702, Oliver H. James vs Rachael James;
1, 8 Mar 1929, case 5702, Oliver H. James vs Rachael James;
Massachusetts State Archive, Boston. )) and supports the date of
Massachusetts State Archive, Boston.</ref> and supports the date of
birth on his SS-5.</p>
birth on his SS-5.</p>
<p>The <i>1930 Federal Census - Citation James</i><a
<p>The <i>1930 Federal Census - Citation James</i><a
style='width:50%;text-align:left;font-size:8pt;padding-top:5pt;'>
style='width:50%;text-align:left;font-size:8pt;padding-top:5pt;'>
Evidentia© 2012-2013</div>
Evidentia© 2012-2013</div>
<references />
</div>
</div>